|


| |

English 1C Resources

GENERAL RESOURCES
Documenting Sources
 | Purdue
University's Online Writing Lab--also available in a printer-friendly
version, this page gives a quick overview of the basics of MLA
documentation, from the basic format for citing both print and electronic
sources to the handling of quotations in your essay. |
 | Research
and Documentation Online--a very useful site created by handbook author
Diana Hacker and Bedford/St. Martin's Press. Divided into sections
covering in-text citations, works cited page, end notes format, and
manuscript format. Provides a sample essay demonstrating proper MLA
format (in a PDF file). |

ASSIGNMENT-SPECIFIC RESOURCES
Analyzing Two Arguments on
Torture
This exercise is a shorter version of what you will be doing for Essay
#1. Read these two articles on the controversial issue of using torture as
a means of combating terrorism, and then write a brief (approximately 2 pages)
analysis of how each author attempts to persuade his reader to accept a specific
position on this topic:
For an example of an effective
analysis, take a look at this student's response to the assignment. Notice
how she applies the concepts introduced in class and relies on specific details
to illustrate her point. It's also important to keep in mind that your own
analysis doesn't need to cover the same features that this student examines.
You may have noticed very different things in your own readings.

Analyzing Arguments within a
Controversy
This assignment asks you to choose one of the following topics, read the
two articles on that topic, and write an analysis of the arguments made by each
author:

Analyzing the 2008
Presidential Election
This assignment requires you examine an aspect of the current
presidential election that you can analyze for its rhetorical features, i.e. how
the two candidates are influencing voters. To begin this, you will need to
choose specific ads, speeches, photos, web content, interviews, etc. that you
can focus on. There are plenty of web sites to look at, but a few of the
best starting places are these:
 |
C-SPAN Politics--Campaign 2008:
This site features an excellent collection of ads, speeches, interviews and
debate footage in the form of video clips and podcasts. |
 |
ProCon.org 2008 Election:
This site offers an objective and well-organized overview of each
candidate's position on the issues. It also has an extensive
collection of election-related material. |
 |
University of Southern California
Election 2008: USC's Media Relations Department put together this
site to examine and analyze media coverage of the election. Consider
using this site as a way to locate sources that can provide helpful
commentary and analysis. |
If you find other useful sites in
your research, please let me know about them to share with the class.

Analyzing Evidence: The
Andrea Yates Case
This exercise requires you to first read through the brief introduction
and three articles focusing on the case of Andrea Yates, the Texas mother who
drowned her five children in June 2001. Then you will write an analysis
that identifies the types of evidence that were used in the articles and case in
general to influence the public's view of Yates.
 |
Introduction to the Yates Case--an
overview of the case itself and the questions that it brings up. Read this
first before the articles.
|
 |
"Mommy Undearest"--a July 4, 2001 article by Sally Satel, a practicing
psychiatrist. Satel provides some background for postpartum depression and
psychosis, and how it applies to the Yates case.
|
 |
"Maternal Madness...or Sheer Iniquity?
Mothers Who Kill"--an October 1, 2001 article by conservative commentator
John Derbyshire that argues in favor of executing Andrea Yates.
|
 |
"Not Guilty, Insane"--a March 2002
op-ed piece by conservative commentator Charles Krauthammer that emphasizes the
importance of Yates' mental state in determining her fate.
|

Analyzing Evidence: Oliver
Stone's JFK
This assignment has two components: a small-group research
project and an individual essay. After watching Oliver Stone's 1991 film
JFK, our class will divide up into teams to research the evidence (or
grounds) Stone uses to support his claim that Kennedy's assassination was part
of a vast conspiracy. When research is completed, each team will first
present its findings to the class, and then submit a written summary report
along with a bibliography of sources consulted. Each summary and
bibliography will be posted on this web site so that the entire class can access
the information.
After the research summaries and
bibliographies are posted, each student will write an essay taking a specific
position on this controversy using evidence found through the group research.
There are numerous sources available
on the Internet concerning the JFK assassination. However, most are of
questionable worth and reliability. Keep in mind that a major portion
of this project involves discerning credible evidence from dubious or false
evidence, so be sure to carefully review any source using the criteria covered
in Chapters 6 and 16 of Writing Arguments. As starting points,
check out the print sources available through
the Shasta College Library, the
searchable periodical
databases also available through our library, and these relatively reliable web sites:
 |
JFK Assassination Records
of the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration--the JFK Act of
1992 required government agencies that held information about the assassination
to catalog and record material as part of a master database. As of
February 2003, the database contains over 268,000 records concerning the Kennedy
assassination. Among the highlights of this site are the full texts of the
Warren Commission Report and the
Report of the House Select Committee on Assassinations. To access
other records, users must rely on the search engine, refining searches as
carefully as possible. Be aware that most of these records are not
accessible on-line and are only available from the National Archives in College
Park, MD, through mail or on-site appointment.
|
 |
Kennedy Assassination Page--authored
by John McAdams, a professor of Political Science at Marquette University.
McAdams is a critic of conspiracy theorists. His web is organized
according to specific topics such as "The Single Bullet Theory"; "Jim Garrison
and New Orleans"; "Lee Harvey Oswald"; and "Medical Evidence." McAdams
also devotes a section to examining the accuracy of Stone's film.
Additional feature: he has RealAudio files of Dallas Police radio
transmissions during the day of the assassination.
|
 |
PBS Frontline:
Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald--the companion web site for the PBS investigative
biography of Oswald. If you have the bandwidth, you can watch the entire
episode on-line using Windows Media Player or Real Player. The site also
has a page dedicated to examining the conspiracy claims made by Stone's film,
and a useful set of links.
|
Summary reports and bibliographies
from this semester's research teams (TTh Section):
For a more absurdist look at this
subject, check out these items:

Analyzing a Web Site
This essay involves closely analyzing a web site to identify the appeals
being made by the site's various elements. Select from one of the
following advocacy web sites:
 |
Mercy
Corps International--an organization that describes itself as "nonprofit
volunteer organization to alleviate suffering, poverty and oppression by
helping people build secure, productive, and just communities." |
 |
World
Relief--an organization that describes its mission as "helping churches
help suffering people worldwide in the name of Jesus." |
 |
American
Anti-Vivisection Society--a group that promotes "animal advocacy
and educational organization dedicated to ending experimentation on animals
in research, testing, and education." |
 |
People
for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)--a high-profile organization
that operates under the principle that "animals are not ours to eat,
wear, perform experiments on, or use for entertainment." |
 |
National
Rifle Association (NRA)--an organization that was "incorporated in
1871 to provide firearms training and encourage interest in the shooting
sports." |
 |
Million
Mom March--a group that describes itself as "national grassroots
movement working for sensible gun laws in America." |
|